United States v. Henry Alexander Crockett

976 F.2d 727, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 22921, 1992 WL 225813
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided September 16, 1992·No. 92-6563·Unpublished

Opinion

976 F.2d 727

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Henry Alexander CROCKETT, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 92-6563.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: August 10, 1992
Decided: Sept. 16, 1992

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Alexander Harvey, II, Senior District Judge. (CR-85-328-H, CA-91-3327-H)

Henry Alexander Crockett, Appellant Pro Se.

Thomas Michael DiBiagio, Office of the United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

D.Md.

AFFIRMED.

Before PHILLIPS, SPROUSE, and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

OPINION

Henry Alexander Crockett appeals from the district court's order refusing relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Crockett, Nos. CR-85-328-H, CA-91-3327-H (D. Md. Apr. 29, 1992). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Henry Alexander Crockett, 976 F.2d 727, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 22921, 1992 WL 225813 (4th Cir. 1992).

976 F.2d 727 (United States v. Henry Alexander Crockett) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related