United States v. Henderson
This text of 4 M.J. 750 (United States v. Henderson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U S Air Force Court of Military Review primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
DECISION UPON FURTHER REVIEW
This case is now before us for the third time. In our initial opinion, United States v. Henderson, unpublished (A.F.C.M.R. 2 March 1976), we set aside part of the forfeitures, but otherwise affirmed the findings and sentence. On 3 June 1976, the Court of Military Appeals vacated our decision and remanded the record of trial with directions to hold further proceedings in abeyance pending disposition of the issues granted in United States v. Jackson; United States v. Courtney and United States v. McCarthy. Those cases having been decided
In reassessing the sentence we note that this case was tried on 8 October 1975, a date preceding the decision in United States v. Courtney, 24 U.S.C.M.A. 280, 51 C.M.R. 796, 1 M.J. 438 (1976), which is the date established by United States v. Jackson, 3 M.J. 101 (C.M.A.1977) as determining the prospectivity of the Courtney decision. We also note that pursuant to a pretrial agreement the adjudged sentence was reduced by the convening authority.
Reassessing the sentence in light of the approved findings of guilty we find appropriate only so much as provides for a bad conduct discharge, confinement at hard labor for eight months, forfeiture of $240.00 per month for ten months and reduction to airman basic.
The findings of guilty and the sentence, both as modified, are
AFFIRMED.
HERMAN, Judge, concurs.
FORAY, Judge, absent.
Jackson was initially decided by order (2 July 1976) and Courtney and McCarthy by decision, 24 U.S.C.M.A. 280. 51 C.M.R. 796. 1 M.J. 438 (1976), and 25 U.S.C.M.A. 30, 54 C.M.R. 30, 2 M.J. 26 (1976), respectively.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
4 M.J. 750, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-henderson-usafctmilrev-1978.