United States v. Henderson

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Henderson. Read the opinion of the Court — 83 F. App'x 677
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided August 18, 2004·No. 03-21076·Unpublished

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit

FILED IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS August 18, 2004 FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk

No. 03-21076 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ARNEZ LAMONT HENDERSON, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-03-CR-3-4 --------------------

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and PICKERING, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Court-appointed counsel for Arnez Lamont Henderson has filed

a motion to withdraw and a supporting brief as required by Anders

v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Henderson has received a

copy of counsel’s motion and brief and has filed a response. Our

independent review of the brief, Henderson’s response, and the

record discloses no nonfrivolous issues for appeal. Counsel’s

motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from

further responsibilities, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5TH

CIR. R. 42.2.

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Henderson, (5th Cir. 2004).

United States v. Henderson (United States v. Henderson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)