United States v. Henderson

674 F. App'x 969
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
DecidedJanuary 27, 2017
DocketNo. 16-12383 Non-Argument Calendar
StatusPublished

This text of 674 F. App'x 969 (United States v. Henderson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Henderson, 674 F. App'x 969 (11th Cir. 2017).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Arthur T. Powell, appointed counsel for Darrell Henderson in this revocation of supervised release appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of [970]*970the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Henderson’s revocation of supervised release and sentence are AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
674 F. App'x 969, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-henderson-ca11-2017.