United States v. Henderson
Opinion
William Sansone, appointed counsel for Octavius Henderson in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Henderson’s conviction and sentence are
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
706 F. App'x 633 (United States v. Henderson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.