United States v. Hemphill

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided February 27, 2023·No. 22-10809·Unpublished

Opinion

Case: 22-10809 Document: 00516655485 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/24/2023

United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ____________ United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 22-10809 Summary Calendar FILED ____________ February 24, 2023 Lyle W. Cayce United States of America, Clerk

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Dvante Hemphill,

Defendant—Appellant. ______________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:22-CR-100-1 ______________________________

Before Davis, Duncan, and Engelhardt, Circuit Judges. Per Curiam: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Dvante Hemphill has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Hemphill has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected

_____________________ * This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5. Case: 22-10809 Document: 00516655485 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/24/2023

No. 22-10809

therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Hemphill, (5th Cir. 2023).

United States v. Hemphill (United States v. Hemphill) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
United States v. Flores
632 F.3d 229 (Fifth Circuit, 2011)