United States v. Hemetek

527 F. App'x 261
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJune 10, 2013
DocketNo. 12-7939
StatusPublished

This text of 527 F. App'x 261 (United States v. Hemetek) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Hemetek, 527 F. App'x 261 (4th Cir. 2013).

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Kathryn Ann Hemetek appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on her 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2012) motion, and denying her motion to amend. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Hemetek v. United, States, No. 3:08-er-00198-l, 2012 WL 3870605 (S.D.W.Va. Sept. 6, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
527 F. App'x 261, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-hemetek-ca4-2013.