United States v. Helriggle

3 D.C. 179

This text of 3 D.C. 179 (United States v. Helriggle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Helriggle, 3 D.C. 179 (circtddc 1827).

Opinion

The Court (Morsell, J., contrd,) quashed the indictment.

See the 29th rule of practice of this Court, The United States v. Shackelford, in this court at April term, 1828, post; The United States v. Hollinsberry, at November term, 1829, post; Commonwealth v. Leap, in this court, April term, 1801, (1 Cranch C. C. 1); The United States v. Sanford, July 14, 1806, Id. 323; The United States v. R. B. Jamesson, January, 1802, Id. 62; The United States v. Singleton, June, 1805, Id. 237; The United States v. Willis, November, 1808, Id. 511; The United States v. Carr, November, 1823, (2 Cranch, C. C. 439.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Carr
25 F. Cas. 302 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia, 1823)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
3 D.C. 179, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-helriggle-circtddc-1827.