United States v. Heinaman
This text of United States v. Heinaman (United States v. Heinaman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit
FILED IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS August 18, 2004 FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk
No. 04-40164 Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
SHAWN QUINTIN HEINAMAN,
Defendant-Appellant.
-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. C-01-CR-360-3 --------------------
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and PICKERING, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Counsel appointed to represent Shawn Quintin Heinaman has
moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance
with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Heinaman was
informed of counsel’s motion but has not responded to it. Our
independent review of the record and counsel’s brief shows that
there are no nonfrivolous issues for appeal. Accordingly, the
motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from
further responsibilities herein, and this appeal is DISMISSED.
See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Heinaman, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-heinaman-ca5-2004.