United States v. Hector Gonzalez
This text of United States v. Hector Gonzalez (United States v. Hector Gonzalez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUL 12 2018 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 17-30197
Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 6:17-cr-00007-SEH
v. MEMORANDUM* HECTOR RICARDO GONZALEZ,
Defendant-Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Montana Sam E. Haddon, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted July 10, 2018**
Before: CANBY, W. FLETCHER, and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.
Hector Ricardo Gonzalez appeals from the district court’s judgment and
challenges his guilty-plea conviction and 260-month sentence for conspiracy to
distribute and possess with intent to distribute methamphetamine, in violation of 21
U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and 846. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). (1967), Gonzalez’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for
relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided
Gonzalez the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se
supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.
Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S.
75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief as to Gonzalez’s conviction.
We accordingly affirm Gonzalez’s conviction.
Gonzalez waived the right to appeal his sentence. Because the record
discloses no arguable issue as to the validity of the sentencing waiver, we dismiss
Gonzalez’s appeal as to his sentence. See United States v. Watson, 582 F.3d 974,
986-88 (9th Cir. 2009).
Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.
AFFIRMED in part; DISMISSED in part.
2 17-30197
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Hector Gonzalez, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-hector-gonzalez-ca9-2018.