United States v. Heath

Eleventh Circuit

United States v. Heath

168 F. App'x 905

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided February 23, 2006·No. No. 05-10722; D.C. Docket No. 04-00229-CR-J-24MCR·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

W. Charles Fletcher, Esquire, appointed counsel for Scott Brandon Heath, has moved to withdraw from further representation of Heath, because, in his opinion, the appeal is without merit. Counsel has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Heath’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

W. Charles Fletcher, Esquire, appointed counsel for Scott Brandon Heath, has moved to withdraw from further representation of Heath, because, in his opinion, the appeal is without merit. Counsel has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Heath’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

United States v. Heath, 168 F. App'x 905 (11th Cir. 2006).

Pincite

168 F. App'x 905 (United States v. Heath) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related