United States v. Hearn
This text of United States v. Hearn (United States v. Hearn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the First Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Citation Limited Pursuant to 1st Cir. Loc. R. 32.3
United States Court of Appeals
For the First Circuit
No. 02-2648
UNITED STATES,
Appellee,
v.
JOSEPH L. HEARN,
Defendant, Appellant.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
[Hon. Steven J. McAuliffe, U.S. District Judge ]
Before
Boudin, Chief Judge ,
Lynch and Lipez, Circuit Judges .
Joseph Hearn on brief pro se.
Peter E. Papps , First Assistant U.S. Attorney, and Thomas P. Colantuono , United States Attorney, on Motion for Summary Affirmance and Memorandum in Support for appellee.
|
July 8, 2003 |
Per Curiam . Upon a careful review of the judgment dismissing appellant's motion to modify his sentence, and in light of the record and the arguments on appeal, the judgment of dismissal is affirmed .
Alternatively, construing appellant's brief as a request for leave to file a second or successive habeas petition, we deny the request for failure to satisfy the statutory criteria.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Hearn, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-hearn-ca1-2003.