United States v. He Kang Lin

1 F. App'x 680
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 9, 2001
DocketNo. 00-10030; D.C. No. CR-99-00027-1-ARM
StatusPublished

This text of 1 F. App'x 680 (United States v. He Kang Lin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. He Kang Lin, 1 F. App'x 680 (9th Cir. 2001).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM1

He Kang Lin appeals his conviction for attempted alien smuggling to a place other than a designated port, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(1)(A). On appeal, Lin argues that the district court erred in finding that venue was proper in the District Court for the Northern Mariana Islands (“CNMI”).2 The identical issue was previously considered by this court in United States v. Zhou Liang, 224 F.3d 1057 (9th Cir.2000), in which we agreed with Lin’s co-defendant, Zhou Liang, that venue in the CNMI was improper. Therefore, for the reasons stated in United States v. Zhou Liang, 224 F.3d 1057 (9th Cir.2000), filed September 13, 2000, we reverse the district court and dismiss the indictment.

REVERSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Zhou Liang
224 F.3d 1057 (Ninth Circuit, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 F. App'x 680, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-he-kang-lin-ca9-2001.