United States v. Hazelbower

76 M.J. 441, 2017 CAAF LEXIS 759
Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces·Decided July 27, 2017·No. No. 17-0087/AR·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

CCA 20150335. On further consideration of the granted issue, 76 M.J. 63 (C.A.A.F. 2017), and the briefs of the parties, it is ordered that the decision of the United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals is set aside. The record of trial is returned to the Judge Advocate General of the Army for remand to the Court of Criminal Appeals for a new review under Article 66, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 866 (2012), to evaluate the case in light of United States v. Hukill, 76 M.J. 219 (C.A.A.F. 2017).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Hazelbower, 76 M.J. 441, 2017 CAAF LEXIS 759 (Ark. 2017).

76 M.J. 441 (United States v. Hazelbower) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Private E1 JAMESON T. HAZELBOWER
Army Court of Criminal Appeals, 2017