United States v. Haywood Williams, Jr.
This text of 107 F.3d 869 (United States v. Haywood Williams, Jr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
107 F.3d 869
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff--Appellee,
v.
Haywood WILLIAMS, Jr., Defendant--Appellant.
No. 96-6878.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Jan. 15, 1997.
On Petition for Rehearing and Suggestion for Rehearing In Banc.
Haywood Williams, Jr. petitions this court for rehearing of his earlier appeal. We grant the petition for rehearing, deny the suggestion for rehearing in banc, and vacate and remand the district court's decision. The district court is directed to determine whether Williams' motion to reinstate a motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1994), amended by Act of Apr. 24, 1996, 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Law. Co-op. Advance Sheet June 1996), was filed prior to the enactment of the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act under Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266 (1988).
Entered at the direction of Judge Luttig. Judge Ervin and Judge Michael concur in granting the petition for rehearing. Judge Luttig dissents and would deny the petition for rehearing.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
107 F.3d 869, 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 7397, 1997 WL 20120, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-haywood-williams-jr-ca4-1997.