United States v. Haywood Williams, Jr.

915 F.2d 1566, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 17333, 1990 WL 140361
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedSeptember 28, 1990
Docket90-6606
StatusUnpublished

This text of 915 F.2d 1566 (United States v. Haywood Williams, Jr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Haywood Williams, Jr., 915 F.2d 1566, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 17333, 1990 WL 140361 (4th Cir. 1990).

Opinion

915 F.2d 1566
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Haywood WILLIAMS, Jr., Defendant-Appellant.

No. 90-6606.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Aug. 27, 1990.
Decided Sept. 28, 1990.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Richard B. Kellam, Senior District Judge. (CR-80-14-N; CA-90-1385-N)

Haywood Williams, Jr., appellant pro se.

Raymond Alvin Jackson, Office of the United States Attorney, Norfolk, Va., for appellee.

E.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before SPROUSE and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Haywood Williams, Jr. appeals from the district court's order refusing relief under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Williams, CR-80-14-N; CA-90-1385-N (E.D.Va. May 31, 1990). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
915 F.2d 1566, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 17333, 1990 WL 140361, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-haywood-williams-jr-ca4-1990.