United States v. Haynesworth

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Haynesworth

103 F. App'x 746

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 3, 2004·No. 04-6578·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Earnest Haynesworth appeals the district court’s orders denying his Fed. R.Crim.P. 41(g) motion for return of property and motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Haynesworth, No. CR-00-52 (E.D.Va. Feb. 11, 2004). We dis *747 pense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately-presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Earnest Haynesworth appeals the district court’s orders denying his Fed. R.Crim.P. 41(g) motion for return of property and motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Haynesworth, No. CR-00-52 (E.D.Va. Feb. 11, 2004). We dis *747 pense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately-presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

United States v. Haynesworth, 103 F. App'x 746 (4th Cir. 2004).

Pincite

103 F. App'x 746 (United States v. Haynesworth) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.