United States v. Haynes

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Haynes

623 F. App'x 113

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided November 24, 2015·No. No. 15-7388·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Willis Mark Haynes appeals the district court’s text order denying his post-judgment motion to dismiss the indictment. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Willis Mark Haynes appeals the district court’s text order denying his post-judgment motion to dismiss the indictment. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

United States v. Haynes, 623 F. App'x 113 (4th Cir. 2015).

Pincite

623 F. App'x 113 (United States v. Haynes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.