United States v. HAYES

CourtNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals
DecidedApril 13, 2026
Docket202500403
StatusPublished

This text of United States v. HAYES (United States v. HAYES) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. HAYES, (N.M. 2026).

Opinion

This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition.

Before DALY, FLUHR, and BROWN Appellate Military Judges

_________________________

UNITED STATES Appellee

v.

Ashonte L. HAYES Corporal (E-4), U.S. Marine Corps Appellant

No. 202500403

Decided: 13 April 2026

Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary

Military Judge: Gable F. Hackman

Sentence adjudged 2 June 2025 by a special court-martial tried at Camp Lejeune, North Carolina, consisting of a military judge sitting alone. Sentence in the Entry of Judgment: reduction to E-1 and a bad-conduct discharge.

For Appellant: Lieutenant Colonel Timothy G. McCormick, USMC United States v. Hayes, NMCCA No. 202500403 Opinion of the Court

This opinion does not serve as binding precedent under NMCCA Rule of Appellate Procedure 30.2(a). _________________________

PER CURIAM: After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of error, we have determined that the findings and sentence are correct in law and that no error materially prejudicial to Appellant’s substantial rights occurred. 1 However, we note that the Entry of Judgment is deficient in that certain specifi- cations are incorrectly summarized. Appellant has the right for the Entry of Judgment to accurately summarize each specification referred to trial and to include the correct date of each offense as required by Rule for Courts-Martial (R.C.M.) 1111(b)(1)(A) and United States v. Wadaa. 2 Although we find no prejudice, Appellant is entitled to have court-martial records that correctly reflect the content of her proceeding. 3 In accord- ance with Rule for Courts-Martial 1111(c)(2), we modify the Entry of Judgment and direct that it be included in the record. The findings and sentence are AFFIRMED.

FOR THE COURT:

MARK K. JAMISON Clerk of Court

1 Articles 59 & 66, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 859, 866.

2 84 M.J. 652, 655 (N-M. Ct. Crim. App. 2024). See Block 11 of the Entry of Judgment

(incorrectly listing Article 81, rather than Article 128, as the offense underlying Charge II and incorrectly stating 23 March 2024, rather than 9 March 2024, as the offense date for Specifi- cation 2 under Charge II). 3 United States v. Crumpley, 49 M.J. 538, 539 (N-M. Ct. Crim. App. 1998).

2 UNITED STATES NMCCA NO. 202500403

v. ENTRY OF Ashonte L. HAYES JUDGMENT Corporal (E-4) U.S. Marine Corps As Modified on Appeal Accused 13 April 2026

On 2 June 2025, the Accused was tried at Camp Lejeune, North Carolina, by a special court-martial, consisting of a military judge sitting alone. Military Judge Gable F. Hackman presided.

FINDINGS

The following are the Accused’s pleas and the Court’s findings to all of- fenses the convening authority referred to trial:

Charge I: Violation of Article 81, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 881. Plea: Guilty. Finding: Guilty.

Specification: On or about 23 March 2024, conspiracy to commit an offense under the Uniform Code of Military Justice, to wit: a violation of Article 128, assault consummated by a battery. Plea: Guilty. Finding: Guilty.

Charge II: Violation of Article 128, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 928. Plea: Guilty. Finding: Guilty. United States v. Hayes, NMCCA No. 202500403 Modified Entry of Judgment

Specification 1: Assault Consummated by a Battery on or about 23 March 2024. Plea: Guilty. Finding: Guilty.

Specification 2: Assault Consummated by a Battery on or about 9 March 2024. Plea: Guilty. Finding: Guilty.

Charge III: Violation of Article 82, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 882. Plea: Not Guilty. Finding: Withdrawn and dismissed without prejudice to ripen into prejudice upon completion of appellate review.

Specification: On or about 23 March 2024, solicitation of another to obstruct justice in violation of Article 131b, to wit: wrongfully delete a video of a 23 March 2024 altercation with the intent to obstruct the due administration of justice. Plea: Not Guilty. Finding: Withdrawn and dismissed without prejudice to ripen into prejudice upon completion of appellate review.

Charge IV: Violation of Article 107, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 907. Plea: Not Guilty. Finding: Withdrawn and dismissed without prejudice to ripen into prejudice upon completion of appellate review.

Specification 1: False Official Statement on or about 26 March 2024. Plea: Not Guilty. Finding: Withdrawn and dismissed without prejudice to ripen into prejudice upon completion of appellate review.

2 United States v. Hayes, NMCCA No. 202500403 Modified Entry of Judgment

Specification 2: False Official Statement on or about 9 March 2024. Plea: Not Guilty. Finding: Withdrawn and dismissed without prejudice to ripen into prejudice upon completion of appellate review.

Specification 3: False Official Statement on or about 23 March 2024. Plea: Not Guilty. Finding: Withdrawn and dismissed without prejudice to ripen into prejudice upon completion of appellate review.

3 United States v. Hayes, NMCCA No. 202500403 Modified Entry of Judgment

SENTENCE

On 2 June 2025, a military judge sentenced the Accused to the following: Reduction to pay grade E-1. A bad-conduct discharge. Confinement For the Specification of Charge I: confinement for 90 days. For Specification 1 of Charge II: confinement for 90 days. For Specification 2 of Charge II: confinement for 90 days. The terms of confinement will run concurrently. Confinement for a total of 90 days. On 22 September 2025, the convening authority modified the adjudged con- finement through post-trial action as follows: For the Specification of Charge I: adjudged confinement of 90 days reduced by 90 days. For Specification 1 of Charge II: adjudged confinement of 90 days reduced by 90 days. For Specification 2 of Charge II: adjudged confinement of 90 days reduced by 90 days. Confinement for a total of zero days.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Crumpley
49 M.J. 538 (Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
United States v. HAYES, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-hayes-nmcca-2026.