United States v. Hayes

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Hayes. Read the opinion of the Court — 351 F. App'x 811
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 9, 2010·No. 10-6371·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-6371

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

HARVEY LEE HAYES, JR.,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Glen E. Conrad, District Judge. (7:06-cr-00002-gec-mfu-1)

Submitted: June 1, 2010 Decided: June 9, 2010

Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Harvey Lee Hayes, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Ronald Andrew Bassford, Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Harvey Lee Hayes, Jr., appeals the district court’s

order denying his motion to correct an error in his sentence.

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. United States v. Hayes, No. 7:06-cr-00002-gec-mfu-1

(W.D. Va. Mar. 5, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Hayes, (4th Cir. 2010).

United States v. Hayes (United States v. Hayes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.