United States v. Hayes
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-6371
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
HARVEY LEE HAYES, JR.,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Glen E. Conrad, District Judge. (7:06-cr-00002-gec-mfu-1)
Submitted: June 1, 2010 Decided: June 9, 2010
Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Harvey Lee Hayes, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Ronald Andrew Bassford, Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Harvey Lee Hayes, Jr., appeals the district court’s
order denying his motion to correct an error in his sentence.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. United States v. Hayes, No. 7:06-cr-00002-gec-mfu-1
(W.D. Va. Mar. 5, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Hayes (United States v. Hayes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.