United States v. Hayes

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 9, 1997·No. 97-6199·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-6199

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

ZACHARY JAMES HAYES, a/k/a Zachery James Hayes,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Winston-Salem. William L. Osteen, Sr., District Judge. (CR-93-121-6, CA-96-668-6)

Submitted: November 20, 1997 Decided: December 9, 1997

Before MURNAGHAN, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Zachary James Hayes, Appellant Pro Se. Paul Alexander Weinman, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal from the district court's orders

granting in part and denying in part his motion filed under 28

U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997), and denying his motion

for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the district

court's opinions accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no abuse of discretion and no reversible error.

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the

appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Hayes, Nos. CR-93-121-6; CA-96-668-6 (M.D.N.C. Dec. 13, 1996; Jan.

21, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Hayes, (4th Cir. 1997).

United States v. Hayes (United States v. Hayes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related