United States v. Hayden

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Hayden. Read the opinion of the Court — 85 F.3d 153
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided September 24, 1998·No. 98-6486·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-6486

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

REGINALD EUGENE HAYDEN, a/k/a Bubba,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District Judge. (CR-94-78, CA-97-409-R)

Submitted: September 10, 1998 Decided: September 24, 1998

Before MURNAGHAN, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Reginald Eugene Hayden, Appellant Pro Se. Ray B. Fitzgerald, Jr., OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlottesville, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying

his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997).

We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of ap-

pealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district

court. United States v. Hayden, Nos. CR-94-78; CA-97-409-R (W.D.

Va. February 27, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate-

rials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Hayden, (4th Cir. 1998).

United States v. Hayden (United States v. Hayden) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related