United States v. Hawthorne

26 F. Cas. 235, 1 Dill. 422
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Kansas·Decided July 1, 1871·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM

(MILLER, Circuit Justice, and DILLON, District Judge, concurring). Crimes against the United States are wholly withdrawn from the domain of state legislation. They are created solely by -congress, and congress has provided for their prosecution and the mode of procedure. Under section 34 of the judiciary act, as construed by the supreme court (U. S. v. Reid. 12 How. [53 U. S.] 361), and under the act of July 6, 1862 (12 Stat. 588). and of July 2, 1864 (13 Stat. 351), it is clear that the right of a defendant, in a criminal case, to testify in his own favor does not exist. On the contrary, the language used manifests an evident intention on the part of congress to exclude such evidence. Testimony excluded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Hawthorne, 26 F. Cas. 235, 1 Dill. 422 (circtdks 1871).

26 F. Cas. 235 (United States v. Hawthorne) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Wynn
9 F. 886 (E.D. Missouri, 1882)