United States v. Hawthorne

26 F. Cas. 235, 1 Dill. 422
CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Kansas
DecidedJuly 1, 1871
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 26 F. Cas. 235 (United States v. Hawthorne) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Kansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Hawthorne, 26 F. Cas. 235, 1 Dill. 422 (circtdks 1871).

Opinion

PER CURIAM

(MILLER, Circuit Justice, and DILLON, District Judge, concurring). Crimes against the United States are wholly withdrawn from the domain of state legislation. They are created solely by -congress, and congress has provided for their prosecution and the mode of procedure. Under section 34 of the judiciary act, as construed by the supreme court (U. S. v. Reid. 12 How. [53 U. S.] 361), and under the act of July 6, 1862 (12 Stat. 588). and of July 2, 1864 (13 Stat. 351), it is clear that the right of a defendant, in a criminal case, to testify in his own favor does not exist. On the contrary, the language used manifests an evident intention on the part of congress to exclude such evidence. Testimony excluded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Wynn
9 F. 886 (E.D. Missouri, 1882)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
26 F. Cas. 235, 1 Dill. 422, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-hawthorne-circtdks-1871.