United States v. Hawkins

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 20, 2000·No. 99-7707·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-7707

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

WILLIE RAY HAWKINS, JR.,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Salisbury. N. Carlton Tilley, Jr., Chief District Judge. (CR-94-264, CA-98-932)

Submitted: April 13, 2000 Decided: April 20, 2000

Before WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Willie Ray Hawkins, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Harry L. Hobgood, As- sistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Willie Ray Hawkins, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994

& Supp. 1999). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the dis-

trict court. See United States v. Hawkins, Nos. CR-94-264; CA-98-

932 (M.D.N.C. Nov. 16, 1999). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Hawkins, (4th Cir. 2000).

United States v. Hawkins (United States v. Hawkins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related