United States v. Hawk

Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces

United States v. Hawk

70 M.J. 262, 2011 CAAF LEXIS 590

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces

DecidedJuly 7, 2011

DocketNo. 11-0569/AR

StatusPublished

This text of 70 M.J. 262 (United States v. Hawk) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Hawk, 70 M.J. 262, 2011 CAAF LEXIS 590 (Ark. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

CCA 20100588. On consideration of the petition for grant of review of the decision of the United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals, it is ordered that said petition is hereby granted of the following specified issue:

WHETHER THE AFFIRMED FORFEITURE OF $1137.00 PAY PER MONTH FOR TWO MONTHS AT A SPECIAL COURT-MARTIAL WAS ILLEGAL UNDER ARTICLE 19, UCMJ, AND RULE FOR COURTS-MARTIAL 1003(b)(2) WHEN APPELLANT WAS REDUCED TO E-l AS PART OF THE SENTENCE.

The decision of the United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals is affirmed as to findings and to only so much of the sentence as provides for forfeiture of $964.00 [263]*263pay per month for two months, confinement for 60 days, reduction to pay grade E-1, and a bad-conduct discharge. [See also ORDERS GRANTING PETITION FOR REVIEW this date.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

CCA 20100588. On consideration of the petition for grant of review of the decision of the United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals, it is ordered that said petition is hereby granted of the following specified issue:

WHETHER THE AFFIRMED FORFEITURE OF $1137.00 PAY PER MONTH FOR TWO MONTHS AT A SPECIAL COURT-MARTIAL WAS ILLEGAL UNDER ARTICLE 19, UCMJ, AND RULE FOR COURTS-MARTIAL 1003(b)(2) WHEN APPELLANT WAS REDUCED TO E-l AS PART OF THE SENTENCE.

The decision of the United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals is affirmed as to findings and to only so much of the sentence as provides for forfeiture of $964.00 [263]*263pay per month for two months, confinement for 60 days, reduction to pay grade E-1, and a bad-conduct discharge. [See also ORDERS GRANTING PETITION FOR REVIEW this date.]

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

70 M.J. 262, 2011 CAAF LEXIS 590, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-hawk-armfor-2011.