United States v. Havis

921 F.3d 628

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·Decided April 18, 2019·No. No. 17-5772·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

A majority of the Judges of this Court in regular active service has voted for rehearing en banc of this case. Sixth Circuit Rule 35(b) provides as follows:

The effect of the granting of a hearing en banc shall be to vacate the previous opinion and judgment of this court, to stay the mandate and to restore the case on the docket sheet as a pending appeal.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED, that the previous decision and judgment of this court are vacated, the mandate is stayed and this case is restored to the docket as a pending appeal.

Briefing and scheduling of this case for oral argument will follow as the Clerk may direct.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

A majority of the Judges of this Court in regular active service has voted for rehearing en banc of this case. Sixth Circuit Rule 35(b) provides as follows:

The effect of the granting of a hearing en banc shall be to vacate the previous opinion and judgment of this court, to stay the mandate and to restore the case on the docket sheet as a pending appeal.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED, that the previous decision and judgment of this court are vacated, the mandate is stayed and this case is restored to the docket as a pending appeal.

Briefing and scheduling of this case for oral argument will follow as the Clerk may direct.

United States v. Havis, 921 F.3d 628 (6th Cir. 2019).

Pincite

921 F.3d 628 (United States v. Havis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

United States v. Jennifer Riccardi

989 F.3d 476 (Sixth Circuit, 2021)

United States v. Christopher Murphy

Sixth Circuit, 2020

Wilson v. United States

M.D. Tennessee, 2020

Kisor v. Wilkie

588 U.S. 558 (Supreme Court, 2019)

Opinion

Related