United States v. Haveriland

8 C.M.A. 621, 8 USCMA 621, 25 C.M.R. 125, 1958 CMA LEXIS 724, 1958 WL 3092
United States Court of Military Appeals·Decided January 24, 1958·No. No. 10,756·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinions

Opinion of the Court

ROBERT E. Quinn, Chief Judge:

Four of the six offenses of which the accused was convicted alleged that he solicited recruits to violate a general regulation. In his instructions to the court-martial, the law officer indicated that each offense authorized confinement at hard labor for two years. Solicitation of another to commit an offense, however, is punishable by confinement for not more than four months. United States v Oakley, 7 USCMA 733, 23 CMR 197. Intermediate appellate authorities substantially reduced the sentence adjudged by the court-martial, but they were apparently unaware of the error in the law officer’s instruction. Accordingly, we return the record of trial to The Judge Advocate General of the Navy for submission to the board of review for reassessment of the sentence in the light of this opinion. United States v Walker, 8 USCMA 38, 23 CMR 262.

Judge FERGUSON concurs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Haveriland, 8 C.M.A. 621, 8 USCMA 621, 25 C.M.R. 125, 1958 CMA LEXIS 724, 1958 WL 3092 (cma 1958).

8 C.M.A. 621 (United States v. Haveriland) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Moore
19 C.M.A. 586 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1970)
United States v. Goodnight
9 C.M.A. 542 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1958)