United States v. Havelock

619 F.3d 1091
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedMay 9, 2011
Docket08-10472
StatusPublished

This text of 619 F.3d 1091 (United States v. Havelock) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Havelock, 619 F.3d 1091 (9th Cir. 2011).

Opinion

645 F.3d 1083 (2011)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Kurt William HAVELOCK, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 08-10472.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

May 9, 2011.

Michael Thomas Morrissey, USPX-Office of the U.S. Attorney, Phoenix, AZ, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Daniel L. Kaplan, Assistant Federal Public Defender, FPDAZ-Federal Public Defender's Office, Phoenix, AZ, for Defendant-Appellant.

ORDER

KOZINSKI, Chief Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this *1084 case be reheard en banc pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Kurt Havelock
645 F.3d 1083 (Ninth Circuit, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
619 F.3d 1091, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-havelock-ca9-2011.