United States v. Hasan

690 F. App'x 312
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
DecidedMay 23, 2017
DocketNo. 16-3824
StatusPublished

This text of 690 F. App'x 312 (United States v. Hasan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Hasan, 690 F. App'x 312 (6th Cir. 2017).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The issue presented by this case is whether Michael Hasan’s aggravated-robbery conviction pursuant to Ohio Rev. Code § 2911.01(A)(1) qualifies as a violent felony under the Armed Career Criminal Act’s (“ACCA”) use-of-force clause. On April 3, 2017, we definitively answered that question. In United States v. Patterson, 853 F.3d 298 (6th Cir. 2017), a unanimous panel of this court held that a conviction under § 2911.01(A)(1) is categorically a violent felony pursuant to the ACCA’s use-of-force clause because the Ohio statute requires proof of the use, attempted use, or threated use of physical force against another person. That resolves this matter. Accordingly, because his Ohio aggravated-robbery conviction qualifies as an ACCA predicate offense, we affirm the district court’s determination that Hasan is an armed career criminal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Patterson
853 F.3d 298 (Sixth Circuit, 2017)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
690 F. App'x 312, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-hasan-ca6-2017.