United States v. Harvey

564 F. App'x 19
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 31, 2014·No. No. 13-4570·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Samad Madir Harvey appeals from his conviction for being a felon in possession of a firearm. On appeal, he challenges the district court’s denial of his motion for a new trial. We review the district court’s ruling for an abuse of discretion. United States v. Smith, 451 F.3d 209, 216 (4th Cir.2006). We have carefully considered the parties’ briefs on appeal and the record, and we conclude that the district court’s reasoning was appropriate and contained no abuse of discretion. (See J.A. at 326-43). Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Harvey, 564 F. App'x 19 (4th Cir. 2014).

564 F. App'x 19 (United States v. Harvey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Smith
451 F.3d 209 (Fourth Circuit, 2006)