United States v. Harvey

564 F. App'x 19
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedMarch 31, 2014
DocketNo. 13-4570
StatusPublished

This text of 564 F. App'x 19 (United States v. Harvey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Harvey, 564 F. App'x 19 (4th Cir. 2014).

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Samad Madir Harvey appeals from his conviction for being a felon in possession of a firearm. On appeal, he challenges the district court’s denial of his motion for a new trial. We review the district court’s ruling for an abuse of discretion. United States v. Smith, 451 F.3d 209, 216 (4th Cir.2006). We have carefully considered the parties’ briefs on appeal and the record, and we conclude that the district court’s reasoning was appropriate and contained no abuse of discretion. (See J.A. at 326-43). Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Smith
451 F.3d 209 (Fourth Circuit, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
564 F. App'x 19, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-harvey-ca4-2014.