United States v. Harshaw

647 F. App'x 168

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Michael Harshaw, Jr. appeals the district court’s denial of a sentence reduction pursuant to 18 U.S.C, § 3682(c) (2012), and Amendment 782 to the Sentencing Guidelines. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Harshaw, No. 5:14-cr-00027-1 (S.D.W.Va. Feb. 5, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED,