United States v. Harry W. Polk
This text of 446 F.2d 1401 (United States v. Harry W. Polk) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellant was convicted of two counts of willfully and knowingly attempting to evade income taxes in the years 1963 and 1964. He was sentenced to pay a fine of $10,000 on each count.
Appellant’s sole contention was that the trial court erred in dénying a motion for judgment of acquittal, pursuant to Rule 29(a), Fed.Rules of Criminal Procedure, said motion having been directed to the sufficiency of the evidence.
Considering the evidence, as we must, in a light most favorable to the Government, we find it sufficient to sustain the convictions. It would serve no useful purpose to detail the evidence and discuss the alleged contradictions and discrepancies therein. These issues were resolved against the appellant by the jury.
The judgment is affirmed. The mandate will issue forthwith.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
446 F.2d 1401, 28 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 71, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-harry-w-polk-ca9-1971.