United States v. Harry Stein, Gerald Gerardi and Alfonso Morgan

327 F.2d 657, 1964 U.S. App. LEXIS 6432
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit
DecidedFebruary 10, 1964
Docket325, Docket 28203
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 327 F.2d 657 (United States v. Harry Stein, Gerald Gerardi and Alfonso Morgan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Harry Stein, Gerald Gerardi and Alfonso Morgan, 327 F.2d 657, 1964 U.S. App. LEXIS 6432 (2d Cir. 1964).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm in open court the convictions of Harry Stein, Gerald'Gerardi and Alfonso Morgan for conspiracy to violate 18 U.S.C. § 2421, commonly known as the Mann Act, and on two additional counts, knowingly causing tw.o women to be transported from Connecticut to New York for the purpose of prostitution and debauchery and for other immoral purposes, and causing the said women to be transported with the intent and purpose to induce and entice them to give themselves up to debauchery and to engage in other immoral practices, all in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2421. Concurrent sentences of imprisonment were imposed by Judge Timbers.

There was abundant evidence to support the verdict of the jury with respect to each of the defendants, his part in causing the transportation of the women from Connecticut to New York, and his knowledge of the purpose in such transportation.

There was no error in receiving the evidence of the conversation which one of the women had over the telephone with “Harry” after calling a number which she was asked to call by the defendant Morgan. United States v. Johnston, 318 F.2d 288, 291, 292 (6 Cir. 1963). There was sufficient credible circumstantial evidence that “Harry” with whom the woman talked was the defendant Harry Stein, and from all the circumstances in the case the jury could so have found. We find the other alleged errors to be without substance. The defendants had a fair trial at which there was overwhelming proof of their guilt.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. John T. Brown
603 F.2d 1022 (First Circuit, 1979)
United States v. Eddie David Cox
449 F.2d 679 (Tenth Circuit, 1971)
Alphonso Morgan v. United States
396 F.2d 110 (Second Circuit, 1968)
Morgan v. United States
265 F. Supp. 779 (D. Connecticut, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
327 F.2d 657, 1964 U.S. App. LEXIS 6432, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-harry-stein-gerald-gerardi-and-alfonso-morgan-ca2-1964.