United States v. Harry F. Werling and Frances C. Werling

Third Circuit

United States v. Harry F. Werling and Frances C. Werling

328 F.2d 992, 1964 U.S. App. LEXIS 5890

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit

DecidedMarch 31, 1964

Docket14541

StatusPublished

This text of 328 F.2d 992 (United States v. Harry F. Werling and Frances C. Werling) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Harry F. Werling and Frances C. Werling, 328 F.2d 992, 1964 U.S. App. LEXIS 5890 (3d Cir. 1964).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This appeal was argued thoroughly and most competently on behalf of the appellants. However, we are not sitting as triers of the fact. And, in our appellate function, we must recognize that there was sufficient evidence to necessitate submission of the case to the jury and to adequately support the jury’s decision as to both defendants.

The judgments of the district court will be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This appeal was argued thoroughly and most competently on behalf of the appellants. However, we are not sitting as triers of the fact. And, in our appellate function, we must recognize that there was sufficient evidence to necessitate submission of the case to the jury and to adequately support the jury’s decision as to both defendants.

The judgments of the district court will be affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

328 F.2d 992, 1964 U.S. App. LEXIS 5890, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-harry-f-werling-and-frances-c-werling-ca3-1964.