United States v. Harrod

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJune 4, 2004
Docket03-7293
StatusUnpublished

This text of United States v. Harrod (United States v. Harrod) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Harrod, (4th Cir. 2004).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-7293

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

MONROE CROWNER HARROD,

Claimant - Appellant,

and

ONE 1993 CADILLAC SEVILLE STS; ONE 1997 FORD EXPEDITION; $20,222.00 U.S. CURRENCY,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William D. Quarles, Jr., District Judge. (CA-02-2816-WDQ)

Submitted: February 2, 2004 Decided: June 4, 2004

Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Monroe Crowner Harrod, Appellant Pro Se. James G. Warwick, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

- 2 - PER CURIAM:

Monroe Crowner Harrod appeals the district court’s order,

entered after a bench trial, forfeiting certain property to the

United States. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

district court. See United States v. Harrod, No. CA-02-2816-WDQ

(D. Md. July 16, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 3 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
United States v. Harrod, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-harrod-ca4-2004.