United States v. Harrod

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Harrod

98 F. App'x 954

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 4, 2004·No. No. 03-7293·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Monroe Crowner Harrod appeals the district court’s order, entered after a bench trial, forfeiting certain property to the United States. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Harrod, No. CA-02-2816-WDQ (D.Md. July 16, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Monroe Crowner Harrod appeals the district court’s order, entered after a bench trial, forfeiting certain property to the United States. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Harrod, No. CA-02-2816-WDQ (D.Md. July 16, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

United States v. Harrod, 98 F. App'x 954 (4th Cir. 2004).

Pincite

98 F. App'x 954 (United States v. Harrod) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.