United States v. Harrod
This text of United States v. Harrod (United States v. Harrod) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-7293
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
MONROE CROWNER HARROD,
Claimant - Appellant,
and
ONE 1993 CADILLAC SEVILLE STS; ONE 1997 FORD EXPEDITION; $20,222.00 U.S. CURRENCY,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William D. Quarles, Jr., District Judge. (CA-02-2816-WDQ)
Submitted: February 2, 2004 Decided: June 4, 2004
Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Monroe Crowner Harrod, Appellant Pro Se. James G. Warwick, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 - PER CURIAM:
Monroe Crowner Harrod appeals the district court’s order,
entered after a bench trial, forfeiting certain property to the
United States. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. See United States v. Harrod, No. CA-02-2816-WDQ
(D. Md. July 16, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 3 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Harrod, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-harrod-ca4-2004.