United States v. Harrison

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedApril 29, 2025
Docket24-30469
StatusUnpublished

This text of United States v. Harrison (United States v. Harrison) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Harrison, (5th Cir. 2025).

Opinion

Case: 24-30469 Document: 49-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/29/2025

United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ____________ United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 24-30469 Summary Calendar FILED ____________ April 29, 2025 Lyle W. Cayce United States of America, Clerk

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Joseph Lawrence Harrison,

Defendant—Appellant. ______________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana USDC No. 6:23-CR-142-1 ______________________________

Before Jolly, Jones, and Willett, Circuit Judges. Per Curiam: * Joseph Lawrence Harrison appeals the 216-month concurrent sentences imposed after his guilty plea convictions for conspiracy to commit kidnapping and aiding and abetting the transmission of interstate communications with the intent to extort. In his sole issue on appeal,

_____________________ * This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5. Case: 24-30469 Document: 49-1 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/29/2025

No. 24-30469

Harrison asserts that the district court erred by failing to apply a mitigating- role reduction pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 3B1.2. Even if we were to assume without deciding that the district court clearly erred by failing to apply the pertinent reduction, the district court considered the guidelines range with and without a § 3B1.2 reduction and explained that it would impose the same sentence regardless of any calculation error. Thus, any error on the part of the district court was harmless. See United States v. Alfaro, 30 F.4th 514, 520 (5th Cir. 2022); see also United States v. Guzman-Rendon, 864 F.3d 409, 411 (5th Cir. 2017). AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Diego Guzman-Rendon
864 F.3d 409 (Fifth Circuit, 2017)
United States v. Alfaro
30 F.4th 514 (Fifth Circuit, 2022)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
United States v. Harrison, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-harrison-ca5-2025.