United States v. Harrison

161 F. App'x 270
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Harrison. Read the opinion of the Court — 261 F. App'x 499
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided January 3, 2006·No. No. 05-7339·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Darrol J. Harrison, a federal prisoner, filed a petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000), raising a claim under United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005). Though the district court construed the § 2241 petition as a motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000), Harrison clearly intended to file a § 2241 petition. Harrison argues on appeal that § 2255 is inadequate and ineffective to test the legality of his detention, contending that his Booker claim should be considered in the context of his § 2241 petition. Because Harrison does not meet the standard under In re Jones, 226 F.3d 328, 333-34 (4th Cir.2000), we affirm the denial of relief. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Harrison, 161 F. App'x 270 (4th Cir. 2006).

161 F. App'x 270 (United States v. Harrison) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Booker
543 U.S. 220 (Supreme Court, 2004)