United States v. Harrison

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided January 31, 1997·No. 96-7306·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-7306

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

RICHARD COREY HARRISON,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, District Judge. (CR-93-418-WMN, CA-95-1230-WMN)

Submitted: January 7, 1997 Decided: January 31, 1997

Before NIEMEYER, HAMILTON, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Richard Corey Harrison, Appellant Pro Se. Bonnie S. Greenberg, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1994), amended by Antiter- rorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-

132, 110 Stat. 1214. We have reviewed the record and the district

court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny

a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the

reasoning of the district court. United States v. Harrison, Nos. CR-93-418-WMN; CA-95-1230-WMN (D. Md. Aug. 8, 1996). Appellant's

motion to have appeal heard on Appellant's brief is denied. We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Harrison, (4th Cir. 1997).

United States v. Harrison (United States v. Harrison) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related