United States v. Harrison
76 M.J. 45, 2016 CAAF LEXIS 1048
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Harrison. Read the opinion of the Court — 76 M.J. 127 →
Opinion
CCA 38745. On consideration of the petition for grant of review of the decision of the United States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals, it is ordered that said petition is hereby granted on the following issue:
WHETHER THE MILITARY JUDGE ERRED BY INSTRUCTING THE MEMBERS, “IF BASED ON YOUR CONSIDERATION OF THE EVIDENCE, YOU ARE FIRMLY CONVINCED THAT THE ACCUSED IS [46] GUILTY OF ANY OFFENSE CHARGED, YOU MUST FIND HIM GUILTY,” WHERE SUCH AN INSTRUCTION IS IN VIOLATION OF UNITED STATES v. MARTIN LINEN SUPPLY CO., 430 U.S. 564, 572-73 (1977) AND THERE IS INCONSISTENT APPLICATION BETWEEN THE SERVICES OF THE INSTRUCTIONS RELATING TO WHEN MEMBERS MUST OR SHOULD CONVICT AN ACCUSED.
No briefs will be filed under Rule 25.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Harrison, 76 M.J. 45, 2016 CAAF LEXIS 1048 (Ark. 2016).
76 M.J. 45 (United States v. Harrison) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
United States v. Martin Linen Supply Co.
430 U.S. 564 (Supreme Court, 1977)