United States v. Harrison

76 M.J. 45, 2016 CAAF LEXIS 1048
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Harrison. Read the opinion of the Court — 76 M.J. 127
Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces·Decided December 15, 2016·No. No. 17-0063/AF·Published

Opinion

CCA 38745. On consideration of the petition for grant of review of the decision of the United States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals, it is ordered that said petition is hereby granted on the following issue:

WHETHER THE MILITARY JUDGE ERRED BY INSTRUCTING THE MEMBERS, “IF BASED ON YOUR CONSIDERATION OF THE EVIDENCE, YOU ARE FIRMLY CONVINCED THAT THE ACCUSED IS [46] GUILTY OF ANY OFFENSE CHARGED, YOU MUST FIND HIM GUILTY,” WHERE SUCH AN INSTRUCTION IS IN VIOLATION OF UNITED STATES v. MARTIN LINEN SUPPLY CO., 430 U.S. 564, 572-73 (1977) AND THERE IS INCONSISTENT APPLICATION BETWEEN THE SERVICES OF THE INSTRUCTIONS RELATING TO WHEN MEMBERS MUST OR SHOULD CONVICT AN ACCUSED.

No briefs will be filed under Rule 25.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Harrison, 76 M.J. 45, 2016 CAAF LEXIS 1048 (Ark. 2016).

76 M.J. 45 (United States v. Harrison) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Martin Linen Supply Co.
430 U.S. 564 (Supreme Court, 1977)