United States v. HARRIS

Opinion

This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition.

Before

HOLIFIELD, McCOY, and MIZER Appellate Military Judges

_________________________

UNITED STATES

Appellee

v.

Jalen R. HARRIS

Hospital Corpsman Petty Officer Third Class (E-4), U.S. Navy Appellant

No. 202300256

_________________________

Decided: 30 April 2024

Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary

Military Judge: Eric A. Catto

Sentence adjudged 29 June 2023 by a special court-martial convened at Marine Corps Base Hawaii, consisting of a military judge sitting alone. Sentence in the Entry of Judgment: reduction to E-1, confinement for ten months, and a bad-conduct discharge. 1

For Appellant:

Commander Lindsay W. Pepi, JAGC, USN

1 Appellant was awarded 113 days of credit for the time he spent on restriction and

in pretrial confinement, along with an extra ten days of judicially ordered credit per the plea agreement for a total credit of 123 days.

United States v. Harris, NMCCA No. 202300256 Opinion of the Court

_________________________

This opinion does not serve as binding precedent under NMCCA Rule of Appellate Procedure 30.2(a).

_________________________

PER CURIAM: After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of error, and Appellant having not challenged the factual sufficiency of this case, we have determined that the findings are correct in law, the sentence is correct in law and fact, and that no error materially prejudicial to Appellant’s substantial rights occurred. 2 The findings and sentence are AFFIRMED.

FOR THE COURT:

MARK K. JAMISON Clerk of Court

2 Articles 59 & 66, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 859, 866.