United States v. Harris
This text of United States v. Harris (United States v. Harris) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition.
Before GASTON, HOUTZ, and STARITA Appellate Military Judges
_________________________
UNITED STATES Appellee
v.
Cortlyn D. HARRIS Aviation Ordnanceman Airman (E-3), U.S. Navy Appellant
No. 202000102
Decided: 26 August 2020
Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary
Military Judge: Chad Temple
Sentence adjudged 27 February 2020 by a general court-martial con- vened at Naval Base San Diego, California, consisting of a military judge sitting alone. Sentence in the Entry of Judgment: confinement for 120 days and a bad-conduct discharge.
For Appellant: Captain Daniel J. McCoy, JAGC, USN
For Appellee: Brian K. Keller, Esq.
This opinion does not serve as binding precedent under NMCCA Rule of Appellate Procedure 30.2(a). United States v. Harris, No. 202000102 Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM: After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of error, we have determined that the findings and sentence are correct in law and fact and that no error materially prejudicial to Appellant’s substantial rights occurred. Uniform Code of Military Justice arts. 59, 66, 10 U.S.C. §§ 859, 866 (2018). The findings and sentence are AFFIRMED.
FOR THE COURT:
RODGER A. DREW, JR. Clerk of Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Harris, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-harris-nmcca-2020.