United States v. Harris
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
FtLEn
UNITED STATES oF AMER!CA, j MAR 2 2 2013 § @‘f,'.‘.’r'l§' ll;FzrlZl?}-Q?§;‘i§?'él,'»‘.‘.’?,f§l@ v. ) Criminal No. 13-037 (ESH) AYESHA HARRIS, j Defendant. j ) 0RDER
ln a hearing before Magistrate Judge Alan Kay on February 25, 2013, defendant Ayesha Harris entered a plea of guilty. On March 7, 2013, the magistrate judge issued a Report and Recommendation advising the C0urt to accept defendant’s plea, Thc Court has received no objection to the Report and Recommcndation. See Local Crim. R. 5 9.2(b) ("Any party may file for consideration by the district judge written objections to the magistrate judge’s proposed findings and recommendations . . . within fourteen (14) days after being served with a cc py thereof.”). Accordingly, the Court hereby adopts the recommendation of the magistrate udge and accepts defendant’s guilty plea. SO ORDERED. /s/ ELLEN SEGAL HUVELLE
United States District Judge
Date: March 22, 2013
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Harris (United States v. Harris) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.