United States v. Harris

6 C.M.A. 112, 6 USCMA 112, 19 C.M.R. 238, 1955 CMA LEXIS 350, 1955 WL 3427
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Harris. Read the opinion of the Court — 6 C.M.A. 736
United States Court of Military Appeals·Decided June 24, 1955·No. No. 6362·Published

Opinion

Opinion of the Court

PER CuRiam:

The accused was found guilty by special court-martial of three offenses of absence without leave, in violation of Article 86, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 50 USC § 680. He was sentenced to bad-conduct discharge, partial forfeitures, and confinement for six months. Following approval by the convening authority, the officer exercising general court-martial jurisdiction suspended the punitive discharge and approved. A board of review in the office of The Judge Advocate General of the Air Force then affirmed. Although the board was composed of three members, only two participated in the decision. We granted the petition for review because other cases were pending which involved the same issue, namely, whether a board of review with two members sitting, possessed the power to act.

The principles set forth in United States v. Petroff-Tachomakoff, 5 USCMA 824, 19 CMR 120, dispose of the only issue in this case.

The decision of the board of review is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Harris, 6 C.M.A. 112, 6 USCMA 112, 19 C.M.R. 238, 1955 CMA LEXIS 350, 1955 WL 3427 (cma 1955).

6 C.M.A. 112 (United States v. Harris) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Petroff-Tachomakoff
5 C.M.A. 824 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1955)