United States v. Harris

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Harris. Read the opinion of the Court — 572 F.3d 1065
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided July 19, 2010·No. 06-50194·Unpublished

Opinion

FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUL 19 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 06-50194

Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. CR-04-01416-(B)-RGK- 2 v. Central District of California, Los Angeles PAULA CAMEO HARRIS, aka, Seal B,

Defendant - Appellant. ORDER

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 06-50200

Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. CR-04-01416-(B)-RGK- 1 v.

PAUL H. RICHARDS, II, aka, Seal A,

Defendant - Appellant.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 06-50225

Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. CR-04-01416-(B)-RGK- 3 v.

BEVAN ATLEE THOMAS, aka, Seal C,

Defendant - Appellant. ON REMAND FROM THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT

Before: TROTT, KLEINFELD and IKUTA, Circuit Judges.

The judgment of this court, Memorandum Disposition filed 02/27/10, is

vacated and the case is REMANDED to the district court for further consideration

in light of Skilling v. United States, 561 U.S. ____ (2010).

It is so ORDERED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Harris, (9th Cir. 2010).

United States v. Harris (United States v. Harris) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.