United States v. Harris

Ninth Circuit

United States v. Harris

103 F.2d 1020, 1939 U.S. App. LEXIS 3765

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided April 20, 1939·No. No. 8816·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In the opinion in this case it was held that the United States is entitled to have its claim allowed as a prior claim under § 3466 of the Revised Statutes, 31 U.S.C.A. § 191. Appellee has petitioned for rehearing on this point in view of the later decision of the Supreme Court in United States v. Algoma Lumber Company, 59 S.Ct. 267, 83 L.Ed.

The petition for rehearing is denied on the authority of Bramwell v. U. S. Fidelity & Guaranty Company, 9 Cir., 299 F. 705, affirmed in 269 U.S. 483, 46 S.Ct. 176, 70 L.Ed. 368.

Rehearing denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

In the opinion in this case it was held that the United States is entitled to have its claim allowed as a prior claim under § 3466 of the Revised Statutes, 31 U.S.C.A. § 191. Appellee has petitioned for rehearing on this point in view of the later decision of the Supreme Court in United States v. Algoma Lumber Company, 59 S.Ct. 267, 83 L.Ed.

The petition for rehearing is denied on the authority of Bramwell v. U. S. Fidelity & Guaranty Company, 9 Cir., 299 F. 705, affirmed in 269 U.S. 483, 46 S.Ct. 176, 70 L.Ed. 368.

Rehearing denied.

United States v. Harris, 103 F.2d 1020, 1939 U.S. App. LEXIS 3765 (9th Cir. 1939).

Pincite

103 F.2d 1020 (United States v. Harris) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related