United States v. Harris

521 F. App'x 185
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 23, 2013·No. No. 12-7661·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Glenn A. Harris appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2012) motion as untimely. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. See United States v. Harris, No. 2:04-cr-00017-BO-1 (E.D.N.C. Sept. 5, 2012); cf. Lo v. Endicott, 506 F.3d 572, 575 (7th Cir.2007); E.J.R.E. v. United States, 453 F.3d 1094, 1098 (8th Cir.2006); Shannon v. Newland, 410 F.3d 1083, 1089 (9th Cir.2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Harris, 521 F. App'x 185 (4th Cir. 2013).

521 F. App'x 185 (United States v. Harris) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Brian Dennis Shannon v. Anthony Newland, Warden
410 F.3d 1083 (Ninth Circuit, 2005)
Lo v. Endicott
506 F.3d 572 (Seventh Circuit, 2007)