United States v. Harris

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 27, 1999·No. 98-7178·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-7178

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

DENNIS CARL HARRIS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry C. Morgan, Jr., District Judge. (CR-92-113-N, CA-97-389-2)

Submitted: May 18, 1999 Decided: May 27, 1999

Before MURNAGHAN, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ronald Edward Schwartz, Cincinnati, Ohio, for Appellant. Laura Marie Everhart, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Vir- ginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Dennis Carl Harris seeks to appeal the district court’s orders

denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 &

Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a cer-

tificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning

of the district court. See United States v. Harris, Nos. CR-92-

113-N; CA-97-389-2 (E.D. Va. Mar. 13, 1998; July 15, 1998). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Harris, (4th Cir. 1999).

United States v. Harris (United States v. Harris) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related