United States v. Harris

Eleventh Circuit

United States v. Harris

157 F. App'x 256

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

DecidedDecember 8, 2005

DocketNo. 05-12108; D.C. Docket No. 04-00052-CR-FTM-29-SPC

StatusPublished

This text of 157 F. App'x 256 (United States v. Harris) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Harris, 157 F. App'x 256 (11th Cir. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Thomas H. Ostrander, appointed counsel for David Lee Harris in this direct criminal appeal, has filed a motion to withdraw, accompanied by a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the record reveals no issues of arguable merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED and appellant’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Thomas H. Ostrander, appointed counsel for David Lee Harris in this direct criminal appeal, has filed a motion to withdraw, accompanied by a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the record reveals no issues of arguable merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED and appellant’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

157 F. App'x 256, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-harris-ca11-2005.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack