United States v. Harrell

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Harrell

71 F. App'x 248

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedAugust 12, 2003

Docket03-6634

StatusUnpublished

This text of 71 F. App'x 248 (United States v. Harrell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Harrell, 71 F. App'x 248 (4th Cir. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Roger Lee Harrell appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reconsideration of a previous order denying his motion to stay a state court proceeding. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm substantially on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Harrell, No. CR-01-112 (E.D.Va. Apr. 8, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Roger Lee Harrell appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reconsideration of a previous order denying his motion to stay a state court proceeding. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm substantially on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Harrell, No. CR-01-112 (E.D.Va. Apr. 8, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

71 F. App'x 248, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-harrell-ca4-2003.