United States v. Harper

Customs and Patent Appeals

United States v. Harper

3 Ct. Cust. 119, 1912 CCPA LEXIS 70

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Harper. Read the opinion of the Court — 2 Ct. Cust. 101 →

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals·Decided February 12, 1912·No. No. 482·Published

Opinion

Held, That an order entered after hearing, that “the petition herein be, and hereby is, dismissed, and that findings and decision be filed and judgment thereon entered herein accordingly,” was not, under the California practice, final so as to preclude and did not preclude appeal from a judgment later entered. The first order clearly contemplated a future finding of facts and judgment thereon.

Motion denied February 12, 1912.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Held, That an order entered after hearing, that “the petition herein be, and hereby is, dismissed, and that findings and decision be filed and judgment thereon entered herein accordingly,” was not, under the California practice, final so as to preclude and did not preclude appeal from a judgment later entered. The first order clearly contemplated a future finding of facts and judgment thereon.

Motion denied February 12, 1912.

United States v. Harper, 3 Ct. Cust. 119, 1912 CCPA LEXIS 70 (ccpa 1912).

Pincite

3 Ct. Cust. 119 (United States v. Harper) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.