United States v. Harper

Customs and Patent Appeals

United States v. Harper

3 Ct. Cust. 119, 1912 CCPA LEXIS 70

CourtCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals

DecidedFebruary 12, 1912

DocketNo. 482

StatusPublished

This text of 3 Ct. Cust. 119 (United States v. Harper) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Customs and Patent Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Harper, 3 Ct. Cust. 119, 1912 CCPA LEXIS 70 (ccpa 1912).

Pincite

Opinion

Held, That an order entered after hearing, that “the petition herein be, and hereby is, dismissed, and that findings and decision be filed and judgment thereon entered herein accordingly,” was not, under the California practice, final so as to preclude and did not preclude appeal from a judgment later entered. The first order clearly contemplated a future finding of facts and judgment thereon.

Motion denied February 12, 1912.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Held, That an order entered after hearing, that “the petition herein be, and hereby is, dismissed, and that findings and decision be filed and judgment thereon entered herein accordingly,” was not, under the California practice, final so as to preclude and did not preclude appeal from a judgment later entered. The first order clearly contemplated a future finding of facts and judgment thereon.

Motion denied February 12, 1912.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

3 Ct. Cust. 119, 1912 CCPA LEXIS 70, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-harper-ccpa-1912.