United States v. Harold Smith, Jr.
This text of 14 F.3d 598 (United States v. Harold Smith, Jr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
14 F.3d 598
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Harold SMITH, Jr., Defendant-Appellant.
No. 93-6331.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Oct. 28, 1993.
Decided Dec. 23, 1993.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville.
Harold Smith, Jr., appellant pro se.
William Corley Lucius, Asst. U.S. Atty., for appellee.
Before PHILLIPS, WILKINSON, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
OPINION
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 (1988) motion. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Smith, No. CR-85-166-6; CA-92-2649-3-K (D.S.C. Mar. 3, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
14 F.3d 598, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 37080, 1993 WL 533404, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-harold-smith-jr-ca4-1993.